Optery vs DeleteMe for Tax Advisory Partners
Tax advisory firms sit at the center of a well-documented seasonal problem: filing-season phishing campaigns specifically impersonate tax professionals, using whatever personal details are available to make the impersonation convincing. A multi-state practice, with preparer credentials on file in several jurisdictions, has more public surface area than a single-state practice, which changes how the Optery-versus-DeleteMe decision should get made.
Here's how that decision played out for a composite eight-partner multi-state tax advisory firm.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
The starting point: a partner's name shows up more than expected
The firm's managing partner runs a baseline search and finds a home address, personal cell number and an approximate net worth estimate, the last one pieced together by a broker from property records and public filings rather than anything the firm disclosed. None of this is secret information exactly, but having it assembled into one searchable profile changes the risk from theoretical to concrete, especially heading into a season when tax professionals are actively being impersonated.
The decision: automated coverage across the partner group
Given the firm's size and the fact that most partners have straightforward, consistent professional histories, the firm chooses Optery's business tier to enroll the full partner group under one account. The ongoing, automated model fits a firm that doesn't want to manage individual caseworker relationships for eight different people, and the screenshot verification gives the firm's own risk committee something concrete to review periodically.
The exception they carved out
One senior partner, who's held preparer credentials in four states over a long career with slightly different name formats on file in each, turns out to be a case automation handles poorly. Rather than moving the whole firm to a human-run service, the firm has that partner work directly with a caseworker to reconcile the older records, a manageable exception rather than a reason to change the default for everyone else.
What the exercise revealed about the preparer directory
Midway through the cleanup, the firm checks what the IRS preparer directory shows for each partner and finds two entries still listing a personal address from years earlier, before the firm's own office existed. Updating those isn't something either removal service does, since it's a government directory, but it turns out to be one of the more consequential fixes in the whole exercise, given how directly that directory ties a preparer's name to tax season specifically.
How this connected to the firm's client-facing security messaging
Once the program was running, the firm added a short, honest note to its annual client communication: the firm maintains an internal privacy and security practice for its own partners and staff, part of a broader effort to reduce the risk of impersonation scams that target both preparers and their clients each filing season. Clients responded well to it, seeing it as a sign of operational maturity rather than something to be alarmed about.
What changed by the following filing season
The following year's filing season passed without any partner reporting an impersonation attempt referencing personal details, though the firm can't say for certain whether that's the removal program's doing or simple good luck over one season. What they can say is the program gives them a documented, defensible answer the next time a client or regulator asks what the firm does to protect its own people from being used as a vector for fraud against client data.
The filing gap that almost got missed entirely
The firm's own formation filing, from when it was a three-person practice, still listed the founding partner's home address. No removal service touches state formation records, so brokers would have kept re-scraping that address indefinitely without a separate fix. A commercial registered agent closed the gap, and the firm now treats reviewing the formation filing as a standing item whenever the partnership structure changes.
What the firm would tell a smaller practice starting from scratch
The managing partner's advice for a smaller firm considering the same setup: don't wait for a partner count that feels large enough to justify a business-tier plan. A two- or three-partner practice has the same seasonal impersonation risk as an eight-partner one, just distributed across fewer people, and the per-partner cost of an automated removal service doesn't meaningfully change with firm size.
The other piece of advice was to loop in whoever manages the firm's IT and email security at the same time, since the conversation about exposed personal information naturally extends into a broader conversation about phishing awareness training, one that filing-season impersonation scams make directly relevant to the same audience regardless of how many partners happen to be listed on the letterhead that year.
Advice for a smaller practice starting out:
- Enroll now rather than waiting for a partner count that feels large enough to justify a business-tier plan.
- Recognize that a small practice faces the same filing-season impersonation risk as a larger one, just spread across fewer people.
- Set the program up in the fall or early winter, before busy season raises the risk.
- Check the IRS preparer directory and the firm's formation filing for old personal addresses, since neither service updates them.
- Extend coverage to staff preparers with a public directory listing or client-facing role as budget allows.
What Good Looks Like
A multi-state tax advisory firm with a solid privacy practice covers every partner and client-facing preparer, corrects any preparer directory listing still showing a personal address, fixes the firm's own formation filing, and has the whole program running well before filing season rather than starting it during the rush.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is filing season really when this matters most?
Yes, risk peaks during filing season, but the setup is better done in the fall or early winter. Impersonation attempts targeting tax professionals reliably increase then, so having the program already running before busy season arrives matters more than starting once the risk is elevated.
Should this extend beyond partners to staff preparers?
It's worth extending to any preparer with a public directory listing or client-facing role, since the same impersonation risk applies regardless of partnership status. Firms often start with partners and expand from there as budget allows.
Can either service update what the IRS preparer directory shows?
No, that's a government directory a preparer manages directly, separate from commercial data broker removal. It's worth checking that listing specifically, since it's the one most directly tied to filing-season impersonation risk.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
Setting Up Governance for a Multi-State Tax Advisory Firm
A step-by-step approach to board and committee governance for a corporate and multi-state tax advisory practice, and where Diligent or BoardPro fits.
Equity Questions Every Growing Tax Advisory Firm Asks
Common equity questions from corporate and multi-state tax advisory firms, and how the answers point toward Pulley, Carta, or neither.
Multi-State Tax Firms: Smoothing a Brutal Seasonal Curve
Multi-state tax advisory firms live and die by a compressed filing season. A step-by-step look at the fractional CFO vs controller decision.
Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Tax Practice Leader
Answers to what a corporate or multi-state tax advisory firm should ask before choosing a search firm or executive marketplace for its next hire.
Selling a Multi-State Tax Advisory Practice
A worked example of a corporate and multi-state tax advisory firm weighing Acquire.com against Flippa, including how seasonality shapes the deal.
Ironclad vs LinkSquares for Multi-State Tax Advisory Firms
A checklist for multi-state tax advisory firms comparing Ironclad and LinkSquares for engagement letters that must flex by jurisdiction and filing deadline.