Cap Table & Equity Management3 min readUpdated September 2026

Pulley vs. Carta: Production Points Are Not Company Equity

A studio promises its lead producer backend points on a hit show and, separately, a stake in the company itself, and treats both as roughly the same kind of upside. They are not the same instrument, and confusing them creates two different problems: a profit-sharing agreement with no real terms, and a cap table that does not reflect what was actually promised.

Digital media and production studios generate this confusion constantly because both kinds of promises get made in the same conversation, often verbally, often by the same founder trying to retain the same person.

Vendors Covered in this Article

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

Two Different Promises: Points and Equity

Backend points, a share of a specific production's profit, are a contractual right tied to one project's revenue and costs. Company equity is ownership in the studio itself, with rights that extend well beyond any single production. A producer can reasonably hold one without the other, or both, but the terms of each need to be documented separately.

The most common failure is a founder promising points on a show and equity in the studio in the same sentence, without ever writing down which is which. The producer walks away believing they have more, or different, upside than what actually gets formalized later.

Say a founder tells a producer, over a celebratory dinner after a show gets picked up, that they will get a piece of the profit and a piece of the company. Six months later only the points agreement gets drafted, because that is the one tied to a specific, trackable revenue event. The equity promise quietly disappears, not out of bad faith, but because nothing forced it to become a real document the way the points agreement did.

Why This Distinction Changes What You Need From Software

Neither Pulley nor Carta tracks backend points on individual productions. That belongs in each production's own profit participation agreement and its own accounting, tied to that show's revenue and costs. What both platforms do track is company-level equity: real stock, options, or a phantom plan tied to the studio's overall performance.

If your studio's biggest administrative headache is reconciling points across a dozen active productions, a cap table platform will not solve that. It solves the separate, narrower problem of who owns the studio itself.

Where Pulley Fits a Studio

Pulley can be a reasonable fit for a studio that is a single entity with a small group of owners and wants to issue equity or options to key producers and executives, alongside a current 409A valuation.

It has no role in tracking production-level points, so if that is the primary thing driving your team's compensation conversations, expect to manage it entirely outside whichever cap table tool you choose.

For a young studio with one or two founders and a handful of equity holders, this narrower scope tends to be the right amount of tool. The bigger administrative lift at this stage is usually getting points agreements written down consistently, not managing a complex cap table.

Where Carta Fits a Studio

Carta becomes more useful once a studio has raised outside capital from a media-focused fund that expects institutional reporting, or once it wants to let an early producer sell part of a vested equity stake for cash before any acquisition talks begin.

For a studio still funding productions mostly through its own revenue and a small ownership group, this is more infrastructure than the company needs yet.

Revisit the choice once a fund investor actually enters the picture, rather than switching preemptively. Moving an existing cap table between platforms is a manageable project, not a reason to over-provision before the need is real.

Writing Down Which Promise Was Actually Made

For every producer or executive who has been promised upside, write down separately whether it was points on a specific production, company equity, or both, and get each one into its own written agreement. A profit participation agreement for points, a grant agreement for equity.

Only the equity side goes into Pulley or Carta. The points side stays in your production accounting, tracked against that show's actual performance, and reviewed the same way you would review any other production cost.

Where a producer holds points on several active productions at once, keep a simple running summary of which shows, what percentage on each, and how those points are calculated, since net profit definitions vary and a producer who assumes a simple revenue share will be surprised by deductions they never agreed to see.

Sort each promise into the right document with these steps:

  • Record backend points in a profit participation agreement tied to one production's revenue and costs, tracked in that show's own accounting.
  • Record company equity in a grant agreement, since ownership in the studio extends well beyond any single production.
  • Enter only the equity side into Pulley or Carta, and keep production points out of the cap table.
  • Write down separately, for each producer or executive, whether the promise was points, equity, or both.
  • Consider a phantom plan tied to overall studio performance when you want to share upside without issuing stock.
Executive Capability Standard

What Good Looks Like

A studio that has this right can point to a written profit participation agreement for every producer who holds points, a separate grant agreement for anyone who holds company equity, and never has one document trying to describe both.

Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)

1. Learn:List every producer or executive who has been promised points, equity, or both, and note which promise, if any, was ever put in writing.
2. Do Manually:Draft a profit participation agreement for outstanding points promises and a separate grant agreement for any equity promises.
3. Delegate:Assign production accounting to track points against each show's actual performance, separately from whoever manages the company cap table.
4. Automate:Move equity grants into Pulley or Carta so studio ownership stays current, while points remain in production-level accounting.
5. Buy:Get a 409A before issuing option grants, and have an entertainment attorney review points and equity agreements so the two never blur together on paper.

How to Get Started

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are backend points the same as company equity?

No. Points are a share of one production's profit, tied to that show's own revenue and costs. Company equity is ownership in the studio itself. A producer can hold either, both, or neither, but each needs its own written agreement rather than one verbal promise covering both.

Can Pulley or Carta track backend points on a production?

Neither platform is built for that. Points belong in a production-specific profit participation agreement tracked against that show's own accounting. Pulley and Carta track ownership in the studio itself, which is a separate thing entirely.

What happens if a producer disputes what they were promised?

This is exactly what separate, written agreements prevent. Without one for points and, if applicable, another for equity, the dispute becomes a matter of memory rather than documentation, which rarely resolves in the studio's favor if the promise was made casually.

About the numbers

This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.

Related Guides