A Managed Services Firm's Guide to Its Next Ops Hire
An MSP's leadership hires carry a specific kind of pressure: clients are paying for uptime and response times under a service-level agreement, and a bad leadership hire doesn't just hurt morale, it shows up in missed tickets and client churn. That raises the stakes on getting the search right, whichever platform you use.
Here's a checklist of the pitfalls that trip up MSPs and IT consulting firms specifically when they're choosing between Hunt Club and Bolster.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Pitfall: Hiring for Technical Depth Over Operational Discipline
It's tempting to hire the most technically impressive candidate available, but an MSP's COO or VP of Service Delivery role is mostly about process discipline: ticket routing, escalation paths, and SLA tracking that doesn't slip when the team is under-staffed on a given week. A candidate who can architect a network but has never run a service desk against an SLA is a weaker fit than one with less technical polish and a track record of operational consistency.
When screening candidates on either platform, ask for specific SLA performance numbers from a previous role and how they were achieved, not just a description of the systems the candidate built.
Pitfall: Underestimating How Client Relationships Change With a New Leader
MSP clients often have a direct relationship with whoever is currently running service delivery, and swapping that person out is riskier than it looks on an org chart. Before finalizing either a Hunt Club or Bolster hire, plan a transition period where the outgoing leader, if there is one, introduces the new hire to your largest clients directly rather than letting the change happen silently.
This matters more for a permanent hire through Hunt Club, where the person is expected to hold those relationships for years, than for a fractional engagement through Bolster aimed at a narrower, time-boxed problem.
Why should you not treat Hunt Club and Bolster as interchangeable?
Hunt Club runs a recruiter-managed search through a referral network built for permanent hires; Bolster is a self-serve marketplace of vetted executives available fractionally, interim, or on a project basis. Using Bolster to try to fill a permanent COO role you actually want someone to hold for years, just because it's faster, often means re-running the search in twelve months once the engagement's natural limits show up.
SHRM's 2025 data put the median time-to-fill for a nonexecutive role at 44 days from requisition to offer accepted, and executive searches routinely run longer1. If your timeline can't absorb that, a fractional engagement through Bolster is the more honest choice, not a shortcut to the same outcome.
How does the real cost difference affect your budget?
SHRM's 2025 benchmarking survey found the average cost of an executive hire at $35,879, against $5,475 for a nonexecutive role, once agency fees and internal recruiting time are included2. A retained Hunt Club search for a permanent operations leader will land in that higher range; a fractional engagement through Bolster is usually billed as an ongoing rate instead, with no placement fee.
Budget for both the direct cost and the client-facing cost of getting the hire wrong. An MSP that churns a client over a bad leadership transition loses recurring revenue that's often worth more than the hire's entire first-year compensation.
Pitfall: Skipping a Real Incident-Response Scenario in the Interview
A resume tells you almost nothing about how a candidate behaves when a client's production system goes down at 2 a.m. Build a scenario into the interview, on either platform, where the candidate has to walk through prioritizing multiple simultaneous incidents across different client SLAs, and listen for whether they can explain their reasoning clearly under pressure.
Candidates who default to vague reassurance instead of a concrete triage process are a risk sign, regardless of how polished the rest of the interview goes. This single scenario tends to reveal more about operational fit than the rest of the conversation combined.
Pitfall: Not Planning for the Handoff on the Vendor Side Too
MSPs sit between clients and a stack of vendor relationships, from ticketing software to the carriers and hardware suppliers behind managed services. A new leader needs to inherit those vendor contacts and contract terms cleanly, not rediscover them during an outage, so build a documented handoff into the first thirty days regardless of which platform sourced the hire.
For a fractional Bolster engagement focused on a narrower fix, this matters less, since the scope is usually limited to one process or one client relationship. For a permanent Hunt Club hire taking over service delivery broadly, treat the vendor handoff with the same seriousness as the client introductions.
Before you open a search on either platform, run through this quick check:
- Screen for operational discipline first: ask for specific SLA performance numbers from a previous role and how they were achieved, not only the systems the candidate built.
- Plan a direct introduction between the new leader and your largest clients so a change in service delivery leadership never reaches them silently.
- Match the platform to the role: Hunt Club suits a permanent seat, while Bolster suits fractional, interim or project work.
- Build an incident-response scenario into the interview and listen for clear reasoning when several client SLAs are at risk at once.
- Document the handoff of vendor contacts and contract terms in the first thirty days so nothing has to be rediscovered during an outage.
What Good Looks Like
An MSP or IT consulting firm can show a documented transition plan for introducing a new leadership hire to its top clients, and has matched the hiring vehicle, fractional or permanent, to how long that person actually needs to hold the seat.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
An MSP expanding service coverage into new states with a new operations leader should confirm entity filings there are current before contracts get signed.
Consistent monthly billing cycles are common at MSPs, so banking with clean automated payroll makes a new operations leader's first quarter easier to manage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a fractional operations leader manage client SLAs effectively at an MSP?
It depends on scope. A fractional leader can effectively own a defined project, like rebuilding an escalation process, but ongoing, daily SLA accountability across a full client base usually needs a full-time owner who's reachable when something breaks at an inconvenient hour.
How do we vet a candidate's SLA track record if we can't verify it directly?
Ask for specific, named metrics from a previous role, like average response time or first-call resolution rate, and press on how those were measured. A candidate who can't describe their own numbers with confidence likely wasn't the one actually accountable for them.
Should clients be told when we're changing service delivery leadership?
For your larger accounts, yes, and ideally through a direct introduction rather than a generic announcement. Clients who have an existing relationship with the outgoing leader are the ones most likely to notice, and get nervous about, a silent handoff.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Median time-to-fill, requisition open to offer accepted (SHRM 2025). SHRM 2025 Recruiting Executives Benchmarking data brief (PDF), 2025.
- Average cost-per-hire (SHRM 2025 Benchmarking). SHRM 2025 Benchmarking Reports press release, 2025.
Related Guides
IT Consulting Firms: Choosing Between Pulley and Carta
How an IT consulting or managed service provider should weigh Pulley against Carta for partner equity, client-relationship retention, and dilution.
Vouch vs Embroker for IT Consulting and Managed Service Providers
A pitfall checklist for IT consulting firms and managed service providers weighing Vouch against Embroker for tech E&O and cyber liability coverage.
Optery vs DeleteMe for MSP and IT Consulting Owners
A worked example showing how an IT consulting or managed service provider owner should approach Optery versus DeleteMe for personal privacy.
Deel vs Remote for IT Consulting: A Pre-Hire Checklist
A pre-hire checklist for IT consulting and managed service firms choosing between Deel and Remote before giving overseas hires access to client networks.
A Worksheet for Hiring an M&A Advisory Partner
A worksheet an M&A advisory or growth strategy firm can use to choose between a search firm and an executive marketplace for its next hire.
IT Consulting and MSPs: Flat-Fee Billing Needs a Controller
IT consulting and managed service firms mix time-and-materials with flat-fee bundles. Here is which billing model pushes you toward a controller.