A Worksheet for Hiring an M&A Advisory Partner
An M&A advisory firm's senior leadership hires carry a specific kind of scrutiny: clients are trusting this person with confidential deal information and expecting sound judgment under real financial pressure, often with a lot of money and a founder's entire life's work on the line at once. Work through this worksheet carefully before choosing between Hunt Club and Bolster for that hire.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Question One: Deal Experience or Advisory Relationship Skill?
Some firms need a partner who can run technical deal execution, financial modeling, diligence coordination, and negotiation mechanics; others need someone whose primary value is the relationship and trust built with clients over many years. Name which one your firm actually needs more before searching, since these are genuinely different skill profiles.
Hunt Club's referral network can surface candidates whose deal execution reputation is known within a specific sector through peer introductions. Bolster's marketplace lets you browse more broadly, including fractional advisors who can test a client relationship function before it's a permanent hire.
Question Two: Permanent Partner or a Defined Deal Cycle?
A permanent, senior partner-level hire, best sourced through Hunt Club, fits a firm building out a practice area or sector focus indefinitely. A narrower need, like adding deal capacity for a specific active engagement or a busy period, is often better served by a fractional or interim advisor through Bolster.
Be honest about which situation actually describes your firm right now, since a permanent hire brought on for what's really a temporary capacity crunch tends to become an expensive mismatch once that crunch passes and the deal pipeline returns to a more normal pace.
Question Three: What Should This Hire Cost?
SHRM's 2025 benchmarking survey has two useful figures worth writing down: a nonexecutive hire averages $5,475, while an executive hire averages $35,879 once agency fees and internal recruiting hours are counted1. A retained Hunt Club search for a permanent partner will track toward that executive figure, and partner-level compensation at an advisory firm typically runs well above it once carry and deal-based incentives are added.
For the firm's own finance leadership, BLS's May 2025 wage data put the median for accountants and auditors at $83,680 nationally, with the top quartile at $109,8102. A finance lead managing deal-based revenue recognition typically commands toward the higher end of that range.
Question Four: How Long Should the Search Take?
SHRM's 2025 data separately found nonexecutive roles taking a median 44 days from requisition to offer accepted, with executive and partner-level searches often running considerably longer given how thin the qualified pool can be at this seniority3. Build that timeline into any active engagement planning rather than assuming either platform can beat it comfortably.
Question Five: How Do You Verify Deal Track Record Confidentially?
Most real deal experience is confidential, which makes verification harder than in other industries. Ask candidates to describe deals in terms of their role, the challenges, and outcomes without naming clients or targets, and check references the same way. A candidate who can speak specifically about their contribution without naming names usually has real experience; one who can only speak in generalities is a risk sign.
Push further by asking about a deal that fell apart, not just ones that closed successfully. How someone describes a failed process, what they learned, and how they handled the client relationship afterward tells you far more about real judgment than another list of closed transactions ever will.
Question Six: Who at the Firm Owns This Decision?
Partner-led firms can let a leadership search stall without one clearly accountable decision-maker, especially at this seniority where every partner wants input. Name one partner or a small committee with explicit authority to move the search forward, on either platform, so a strong, in-demand candidate doesn't lose interest waiting on a full, slow partnership vote.
Question Seven: How Should the Offer Structure Reflect Deal Risk?
Partner-level compensation at an advisory firm often blends base salary with carry or deal-based incentives, and the exact mix should reflect how much of the role's value is repeatable relationship management versus one-off deal execution. A candidate coming from a straight-salary corporate background may need real education on how carry works and what it means for near-term cash compensation.
Be explicit about this structure early in the process, on either platform, rather than surprising a strong candidate with an unfamiliar compensation model at the offer stage, when it's harder for both sides to negotiate calmly and walk away without hard feelings if the terms genuinely don't fit what the candidate needs financially.
Complete this checklist before the first interview:
- Decide whether the seat needs technical deal execution or a partner whose value is client relationships and trust built over many years.
- Match the need to the platform: a permanent partner through Hunt Club, or added deal capacity for a busy period through Bolster.
- Verify deal track record confidentially by asking for role, challenges and outcomes without client or target names, and check references the same way.
- Name one partner or a small committee with explicit authority to move the search forward.
- Structure the offer to reflect how much of the role's value is repeatable relationship management versus one-off deal execution.
What Good Looks Like
An M&A advisory firm can name whether its leadership gap is deal execution or client relationship skill, has verified a finalist's track record through specific, confidentiality-respecting questions, and has one clearly accountable decision-maker driving the search to a conclusion.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
A firm adding partners or opening offices in new states should confirm entity filings and registered agent coverage there stay current.
Deal-based revenue with uneven timing is easier to manage with banking built for that cash flow pattern, which a new finance or partner-level hire will want visibility into.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should a boutique M&A firm hire a full-time partner or use fractional deal capacity?
If the need is a temporary capacity crunch during a busy period, fractional capacity through Bolster is usually the better fit. A permanent partner makes sense once the firm is building out a lasting sector focus or client base that needs a dedicated owner.
How do we check deal experience without breaching confidentiality?
Ask candidates and references to describe role, challenges, and outcomes without naming specific clients or targets. Specificity about the candidate's own contribution, even without names, is a strong signal of real experience.
Is partner-level compensation realistic to benchmark against general executive hiring data?
General executive hiring cost data is a useful floor, but partner-level compensation at an advisory firm typically includes carry or deal-based incentives well above standard executive pay, so treat published averages as a starting point, not a ceiling.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Average cost-per-hire (SHRM 2025 Benchmarking). SHRM 2025 Benchmarking Reports press release, 2025.
- Annual wage, Accountants and Auditors (SOC 13-2011), US all industries. BLS OEWS May 2025, 2025.
- Median time-to-fill, requisition open to offer accepted (SHRM 2025). SHRM 2025 Recruiting Executives Benchmarking data brief (PDF), 2025.
Related Guides
Hunt Club vs Bolster vs Heidrick: Executive Search Compared
Compare Hunt Club, Bolster, and Heidrick & Struggles for executive recruiting and interim CXO placement. Evaluate fees, talent networks, and fill times.
Promoting Your First Partner? Here's the Equity Runbook
A step-by-step runbook for granting equity when a boutique strategy or M&A advisory firm promotes its first partner, and where Pulley and Carta fit.
A Managed Services Firm's Guide to Its Next Ops Hire
The pitfalls an IT consulting or managed service provider should watch for when choosing between a search firm and an executive marketplace.
Governance for M&A Advisors Handling Material Nonpublic Information
M&A advisory and growth strategy firms handle material nonpublic information as routine business. Criteria for choosing between Diligent and BoardPro.
Optery vs DeleteMe for M&A Advisory Partners
A rollout plan for M&A advisory and growth strategy partners choosing between Optery's automated removal and DeleteMe's human-run service.
M&A Advisory: Planning Cash Around Lumpy Success Fees
Deal-contingent success fees make revenue wildly uneven quarter to quarter. Q&A on the fractional CFO vs controller decision for an M&A advisory firm.