Executive Search & Leadership Recruiting3 min readUpdated September 2026

Hunt Club vs Bolster for Commercial Solar and Energy EPC Firms

Choose between Hunt Club and Bolster for a commercial solar or EPC leader based on whether your urgent gap is project finance and tax credit fluency or field execution and permitting. Interconnection queues can stretch a timeline by many months, and thinly documented tax credit adders, including prevailing wage and apprenticeship, can cost a project its financing.

That's the backdrop for this search. Hunt Club and Bolster both place EPC and energy leadership, and which one fits depends on whether your more urgent gap is project finance and tax credit fluency, or field execution and permitting reach across jurisdictions.

How do you separate the finance gap from the execution gap?

A CFO or project finance leader who understands investment tax credit stacking, prevailing wage documentation and the adders that depend on it is solving a fundamentally different problem than a COO managing permitting across multiple authorities having jurisdiction and crews across several active job sites. Firms sometimes hire a strong field operator and assume tax credit and financing discipline will follow, and watch a project's economics erode because nobody was tracking documentation requirements closely enough to defend an adder under review. Name the real gap before you write the search brief, since the two skill sets rarely live in the same candidate, and a search brief that quietly asks for both usually attracts candidates who are genuinely strong at neither.

Match the gap to the profile before you write the brief:

  • A CFO or project finance leader handles investment tax credit stacking, prevailing wage documentation and the adders that depend on it.
  • A COO handles permitting across multiple authorities having jurisdiction and crews across several active job sites.
  • A brief that quietly asks for both skill sets usually attracts candidates who are strong at neither.
  • Ask for a specific project where interconnection timelines shifted and how the candidate managed the financing partner through it.

Why Interconnection Experience Is Worth Screening For Directly

A candidate's resume can list plenty of completed installations without ever revealing whether they've actually managed a project through a slow or contentious utility interconnection process, which is often the single biggest schedule risk on a commercial project. Ask directly for a specific project where interconnection timelines shifted meaningfully, and how the candidate managed customer and financing partner expectations through that delay. A leader who has only worked on projects with smooth interconnection hasn't been tested on the part of the job most likely to test your next project. Push further and ask what they'd have done differently if the delay had run twice as long, since that answer separates someone who got lucky once from someone with a repeatable approach.

The Moments a Trusted Introduction Can Actually Vouch For

A resume can list completed megawatts. It can't tell you whether a candidate held their ground when a Treasury review questioned a prevailing wage adder, or how they managed a financing partner through an interconnection delay that threatened a deal's economics. A former colleague who watched those moments happen can. That's the real case for Hunt Club's referral-based sourcing on a search this specialized: the qualifying moments happened in rooms a resume never describes. Ask for that story directly when you get a referral, since a vague endorsement is worth far less than an account of one specific, high-pressure decision the candidate actually made under scrutiny.

Where Flexibility Protects a Project Mid-Review

If your project finance leader departs while an active project's tax credit documentation is mid-review, waiting months for a permanent hire is a real financial risk, not just a staffing inconvenience. Bolster's marketplace model, spanning fractional and interim placement, can put someone with real credit stacking and compliance experience into the seat quickly enough to protect that project's economics while a longer, more deliberate search runs for the permanent role behind it. That kind of coverage during an active review window is often worth more than the fee itself.

A Common Mistake: Hiring Installation Experience for a Finance Problem

It's tempting to hire based on total installed capacity a candidate has delivered, since it's an easy number to compare across resumes. That number says little about whether a candidate can defend a tax credit adder under audit or manage a financing partner's expectations through an interconnection delay. Match the hire to the specific risk that's actually threatening your project economics, not to the most impressive-sounding number on a resume, and be honest with yourself about which risk is actually keeping you up at night.

What to Set Aside for This Search

The median annual wage for general and operations managers nationally is $105,7701, a reasonable anchor for a field execution role, though a project finance leader with real tax credit and interconnection experience typically commands more given how specialized and consequential that knowledge is. Executive hires broadly average $35,879 in cost per hire against $5,475 for a nonexecutive role2, worth building into your planning conversation with finance before the search opens.

Executive Capability Standard

What Good Looks Like

Good looks like a named finance leader who can defend a tax credit adder under review without scrambling, and a named field execution leader whose permitting and interconnection track record matches the complexity of your active project pipeline.

Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)

1. Learn:Review your last project's tax credit documentation and interconnection timeline in detail, so you know exactly what a new hire needs to be able to defend.
2. Do Manually:Have your controller or project lead document the current adder qualification and interconnection tracking process by hand, so a new hire inherits a clear system.
3. Delegate:Bring in an interim finance or operations leader with verified tax credit or interconnection experience to protect an active project while a permanent search runs.
4. Automate:Put tax credit documentation and interconnection status into a system that flags upcoming deadlines automatically, rather than tracking them project by project in spreadsheets.
5. Buy:Run a permanent search once you've named whether the gap is project finance or field execution, and can describe each one's specific requirements clearly.

How to Get Started

Frequently Asked Questions

Should project finance and field operations report to the same leader?

In a smaller firm, often yes, out of necessity. Once the firm is large enough to support both roles separately, splitting them usually produces sharper accountability, since tax credit documentation discipline and field execution genuinely pull in different directions day to day.

Can an interim finance leader defend a tax credit adder under review?

Yes, if they arrive with real, verifiable experience in prevailing wage and apprenticeship documentation and enough runway to review your specific project's paperwork before any review happens. What matters is documented experience, not whether the role is described as interim or permanent.

How long should this search take?

Expect this search to run past the executive median of 45 days from open role to accepted offer, and it can go well beyond 60 days at larger organizations. Real tax credit and interconnection experience is a narrow qualification, so the qualified pool is small.

What should we ask financing partners during a leadership transition?

Tell financing partners directly and early about a leadership change affecting a project they're financing, rather than letting them find out through a missed deadline or a status update that reads differently than usual. Financing partners tolerate transitions far better than surprises.

Sources

Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.

  1. Annual wage, General and Operations Managers (SOC 11-1021), US all industries. BLS OEWS May 2025, 2025.
  2. Average cost-per-hire (SHRM 2025 Benchmarking). SHRM 2025 Benchmarking Reports press release, 2025.

Related Guides