Mercury vs Relay: Banking for an HR Strategy Consultancy
HR strategy and compensation consultancies typically run two revenue types side by side: project fees for a defined engagement, a compensation study, an org design review, a handbook overhaul, and ongoing retainers for firms that keep the consultancy on call for advisory support through the year.
This checklist walks through the account structure decisions that fit that specific mix, in the order they usually matter.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Separate Project Fees From Retainer Income
A large project fee landing the same month as several retainer payments can make that month look unusually strong, and a founder planning next quarter's hiring off that blended number risks overcommitting once the project revenue doesn't repeat. Relay's free sub-accounts make the separation simple: route retainer income into an operating account that represents the firm's real recurring baseline, and hold project fees in a second account released to broader use on a planned schedule rather than the moment they clear.
Compensation Studies Often Require Confidential Data Handling
Firms running compensation benchmarking studies sometimes handle sensitive client payroll data as part of the engagement, which is a data security and confidentiality question more than a banking one, but it's worth mentioning here because that same care should extend to how the study's own project fee and any pass-through data licensing costs are tracked. Keep those costs in a dedicated account tied to the specific engagement, both for your own margin visibility and so a client asking exactly what a benchmarking data license cost within a project can get a clean, specific answer.
What Idle Retainer Cushion Should Be Earning
A firm with a growing base of retainer clients often ends up holding more idle cash between billing cycles than a project-only consultancy would. That's worth automating: with the effective federal funds rate at 3.63%1 right now, Mercury's Treasury sweep can capture yield near that level on cash above your working buffer instead of leaving it flat in a checking account. If your retainer base has grown to the point that a meaningful cushion sits idle each month, that's worth automating rather than leaving flat in a checking account.
Financing a Slow Project Pipeline
A firm bridging a quiet stretch between project engagements with a line of credit is borrowing at a cost tied to the bank prime rate, currently 6.75%2. Before leaning on credit regularly, check whether the retainer base alone covers baseline operating costs; a firm where retainers cover the floor and project work is genuinely upside doesn't need to finance quiet project stretches the way a firm depending on project fees to make payroll does.
Matching the Bank to How You Track Engagements
A firm running dedicated practice management software to track engagements, deliverables and billing gets more from Mercury's API, pulling banking data directly into that system. A firm running project and retainer tracking out of a spreadsheet alongside QuickBooks or Xero can often start with Relay, whose accounting integrations and extra checking accounts on the free plan (up to 20 per business per its pricing page) may cover the need without custom integration work.
Reviewing the Setup as the Practice Grows
A consultancy that starts as a solo practitioner doing project work often adds retainer clients as it grows, which shifts the balance between lumpy and steady revenue over time. Revisit the account structure at least annually, since a setup built around mostly project work in year one may need real adjustment once retainers make up half the business by year three, and a founder who never revisits it is the one most likely to be caught flat-footed by a slow project quarter that a now-larger retainer base should have comfortably absorbed.
When a Solo Practitioner Adds Associate Consultants
Bringing on associate consultants, whether as employees or subcontractors, is usually the point where a founder's informal habit of checking one balance before making a decision stops working. Set up the project and retainer separation described above before that first hire starts, not after, so payroll for a new associate is always funded from a clearly identified source rather than competing with whatever project fee happened to clear most recently. A founder who waits until after the first hire to build this structure usually ends up retrofitting it under more pressure than building it fresh would have taken.
A Short List Before You Apply
Estimate what share of next year's revenue will be retainer versus project work, since that ratio drives how much of your cash position is predictable. Check whether your compensation study work involves handling sensitive client payroll data that deserves its own careful account tracking. And confirm with your bookkeeper which platform's export format they already use, since that familiarity saves real time over a full year of monthly closes.
Before you open an account, check these points:
- Estimate what share of next year's revenue will be retainer versus project work, because that ratio determines how predictable your cash position is.
- Confirm whether compensation study work involves sensitive client payroll data that deserves its own carefully controlled account structure.
- Decide how project fees and retainer income will stay separate, before a large project payment lands in the same month as several retainers.
- Match the bank to how you track engagements, weighing API access for practice management software against QuickBooks or Xero integration for spreadsheet tracking.
What Good Looks Like
A well-run HR consultancy can state its retainer baseline separately from project fee revenue at any point, and can produce a clean cost accounting for a specific engagement, including any data licensing, on request.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Mercury fits a firm with a growing retainer cushion worth sweeping into yield, or one running practice management software worth connecting through an API.
Relay fits most HR consultancies first: free sub-accounts keep retainer and project income cleanly separated without extra cost.
Brex fits once a few consultants beyond the founder are expensing travel or software regularly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should data licensing costs for a compensation study be billed separately from consulting fees?
Many firms itemize them separately on the client invoice for transparency, even when the project fee is quoted as one number, since a client evaluating cost is often curious what portion covers data versus analysis and advisory time.
How should a firm handle a retainer client who also commissions occasional projects?
Keep the retainer and project fee in separate accounts, even for the same client. The two streams behave differently, one predictable and recurring, one lumpy and tied to a specific deliverable, and mixing them for simplicity undermines the visibility the separation is meant to provide.
Is Brex useful for a small HR consultancy?
Mainly once you have a few consultants beyond the founder expensing travel or software regularly. A very small practice often gets by fine on the bank's own card product without an added spend management layer.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Effective federal funds rate (monthly average). FRED series FEDFUNDS; cross-checked vs Federal Reserve H.15 release (3.63% on 2026-06-30), 2026.
- Bank prime loan rate (WSJ prime equivalent). Federal Reserve H.15 Selected Interest Rates, 2026.
Related Guides
Should an HR Consultancy Practice What It Preaches on Equity?
HR and compensation consultancies advise clients on equity design. Here's how Pulley and Carta compare for getting the firm's own house in order.
Where HR Consulting Advice Crosses Into Legal Risk
HR strategy and compensation consulting firms handle sensitive client data and advice that can edge into legal territory. A Q&A on governance for this risk.
Bizee vs. Doola for an HR Consulting Practice
Entity setup for an HR strategy and compensation consulting practice: operating agreements, worker classification for your own bench, and Bizee vs. Doola.
Optery vs DeleteMe for HR Consulting Leaders
A worksheet for HR strategy and compensation consulting leaders to work through before choosing Optery's automated removal or DeleteMe's service.
When an HR Consultancy Hires Its Own Leadership
A worked example of an HR strategy and compensation consulting firm using its own hiring expertise to fill its own leadership seat.
Vouch vs Embroker for HR Strategy and Compensation Consulting Firms
A step-by-step way for an HR strategy or compensation consulting firm to evaluate Vouch and Embroker for professional liability coverage.