Optery vs DeleteMe for MSSP Leadership Teams
There's a specific irony in running a managed security service provider: the firm sells protection against exactly the kind of exposure its own leadership often hasn't addressed personally. An MSSP's principals are named in security certifications, quoted in incident-response commentary, and trusted by clients specifically because they're credible experts, which also makes them a more convincing target for anyone trying to reach a client through the vendor.
Rather than a straight product comparison, work through this as a worksheet: five questions that point toward Optery, DeleteMe, or a mix of both, depending on how your team answers.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Question 1: How many people hold privileged access to client environments?
List everyone with standing access to client systems, not just the named principals on the website. An MSSP with a larger security operations team has more people worth covering than the leadership bio page suggests, and a business-tier removal plan that enrolls a group at once is usually more practical than treating this as an individual purchase decided person by person.
This list is often longer than founders expect on the first pass. Tier-two and tier-three analysts who rotate through overnight incident response, along with anyone who holds a standing VPN credential into a client's environment for scheduled maintenance, belong on it even if they've never spoken to a client directly or appeared in any marketing material. Contractors and on-call responders brought in during a surge belong on the list too, at least for the duration of the time they hold active access to client systems.
Before scoring the worksheet: what's already public
Before comparing removal tools, it's worth cataloging what's already visible: conference talks, published incident write-ups, podcast appearances, and any staff bios on the company site that include a hometown, alma mater or prior employer. Security professionals in particular tend to have an unusually rich public footprint, since credibility in this field is partly built by speaking and writing publicly, which is precisely the raw material brokers turn into a fuller profile over time.
Question 2: Does anyone on the team have an unusually complex personal history?
A former name, a security clearance background with a scattered address history, or years of conference speaking under a slightly different professional name all point toward the human-run option, since DeleteMe's caseworkers can verify and reconcile details that automated matching sometimes handles clumsily. If the team's histories are relatively clean and consistent, the automated option covers the same ground with less ongoing overhead.
Question 3: Do client contracts or security questionnaires ask about this specifically?
Enterprise clients evaluating an MSSP increasingly ask pointed questions about the vendor's own operational security, and a documented, ongoing privacy program for leadership and privileged staff is a reasonable, honest answer. Optery's screenshot-verified removals give something concrete to reference; DeleteMe's periodic reports work just as well for this purpose, framed as evidence of an active program rather than a one-time fix.
Question 4: How fast does the team need coverage, and how often does it change?
A growing MSSP that's regularly adding analysts and incident responders benefits from an ongoing, automated model that can absorb new hires without a manual onboarding delay. A smaller, more stable team has more room to use a human-run service, where the slower cadence matters less because there's less churn to manage.
Question 5: What's still exposed that neither tool reaches?
State corporate filings are the recurring answer here too: an MSSP registered as an LLC or corporation has a public filing that lists whoever signed it, and if that's a founder's home address, it stays discoverable regardless of how clean the commercial broker profile becomes. A commercial registered agent is the fix, and for a security-focused company in particular, leaving this gap open after doing everything else right is the kind of inconsistency a security-literate attacker would notice first.
Putting the worksheet together
Most MSSPs land on a hybrid answer: an automated, business-tier removal service as the default for the whole privileged-access team, with a manual, human-handled exception process for the specific individuals whose history is genuinely complicated. That combination costs a bit more in coordination than picking one vendor and moving on, but it matches the actual risk profile better than a one-size answer, and it's worth putting in writing so it survives leadership turnover rather than living only in one person's head, and revisited whenever the firm's own headcount or client roster changes meaningfully. Operations leaders overseeing this kind of program earn a median of roughly $105,000 a year1, which is a reasonable anchor for how much internal time is worth budgeting to run it properly rather than treating it as a five-minute signup.
A typical hybrid setup:
- Enroll the whole privileged-access team, including incident responders and analysts, in an automated business-tier removal service by default.
- Route people with genuinely complicated histories, such as a former name or scattered address history, to a human-handled exception process.
- Correct any state corporate filing that lists a founder's home address, since neither tool reaches it.
- Keep a short, honest description of the program ready for clients whose security questionnaires ask about it.
What Good Looks Like
A mature MSSP privacy program covers everyone with privileged access to client environments, not only named leadership, runs on an ongoing basis, documents itself well enough to answer a client security questionnaire honestly, and treats public state filings as a separate, necessary fix alongside broker removal.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
A practical default for covering a whole privileged-access team at once, with verification evidence worth having on hand for client security questionnaires.
Worth pairing with a broader operational security posture given how MSSP leadership are a specifically credible-seeming target for social engineering.
Closes the state-filing gap that an otherwise security-conscious MSSP can easily overlook in its own formation paperwork.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should incident responders be covered even if they're not client-facing?
Yes. Incident responders often have the deepest access during an active engagement, making them a high-value target even though they rarely appear in marketing materials. Coverage should follow access level, not public visibility.
Does a security certification like a CISSP listing increase exposure?
It can, since professional certification directories are sometimes public and searchable, adding another data point brokers can connect to a person's name, employer and general location. It's worth checking whether any certifying body's directory can be set to a more private listing option.
Is it worth mentioning this program in sales conversations?
Selectively, yes. A brief, factual mention that leadership and privileged staff are enrolled in an ongoing privacy program can strengthen an MSSP's credibility with a security-conscious buyer, as long as it's framed honestly as risk reduction rather than an unbreakable guarantee.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Annual wage, General and Operations Managers (SOC 11-1021), US all industries. BLS OEWS May 2025, 2025.
Related Guides
Setting Up Board Oversight of Security Incidents at an MSSP
A step-by-step approach to building board-level incident and compliance oversight at a managed security services provider, in Diligent or BoardPro.
Equity Retention Tools for MSSPs: Pulley vs Carta
How a managed security service provider should weigh Pulley against Carta for SOC analyst retention, acquisition readiness, and dilution.
PEO Decisions for a Managed Security Provider
MSSPs run round-the-clock SOC shifts and background-check-heavy hiring. Here's a step-by-step way to compare Justworks and TriNet for that reality.
Vouch vs Embroker for Managed Security Service Providers
A worked example of how a managed security service provider might size D&O, cyber, and tech E&O limits when comparing Vouch and Embroker.
Mercury vs Relay: Banking for a Managed Security Provider
MSSPs carry compliance and incident-response costs most consultancies don't. A checklist for setting up Mercury or Relay around that reality.
Deel vs Remote for MSSPs: A SOC Analyst Hiring Worksheet
A worksheet for managed security providers choosing between Deel and Remote before staffing an overseas SOC analyst with access to client alerts.